One of the things which has always fascinated me about the world is how certain invisible laws govern the “spontaneous” events that occur around us (e.g., radioactive decay). For example, to quote one friend after I remarked how surreal it’s been to see many of the malevolent things I’d read about humans doing throughout history emerge around us:
I feel the same way. It’s always so shocking to see, but it shouldn’t be. Genesis was written 3,500 years ago and there’s not a single human frailty described there that I can’t relate to.
In middle school, I was introduced to the bell curve (normal distribution) concept in statistics, which stated that with many sets of natural values or variable quantities, they will become exponentially rarer as you deviate from the mean value (e.g., men who are 6’8” are much rarer than men who are 5’8”) and for years, I marveled at how some invisible force was able to maintain this distribution as I noticed it again and again in the world around me.
Once I dove into medicine and health, it hence was apparent to me that a bell curve distribution existed for how people would react to toxicity and injury (much of which is likely due to the human body having a inherent but variable resistance to toxicity and injury along with an ability to heal from it). As such, when people are exposed to a toxic pharmaceutical or chemical, severe injuries will be rarer than moderate injuries, moderate injuries rarer than minor ones and subtle injuries most people rarely notice will be far more common than the minor ones.
When the COVID-19 vaccines were initially released, I had a large number of patients immediately show up with “moderate” reactions to the COVID vaccines (none of which were reported in the vaccine trials), with many of them stating something to the effect of: “I have gotten a flu shot for years and I have never experienced anything like this.” This was alarming to me, as I knew, per the above bell curve, if that many moderate injuries were occurring, this was likely the tip of the iceberg and I would likely be seeing far more severe reactions to the vaccine than I had initially anticipated.
In turn, before long, people around the country began reaching out to me to ask if the vaccine could cause sudden death or rapidly accelerate dementia due to this happening to a relative (which I spent a year documenting), and in time, I began seeing the same pattern within patients of other providers in my community (again demonstrating how the bell curve distributes).
Note: on the other end of the spectrum, I began noticing a lot of people around me developed abducens nerve palsies (one of the most easy to detect and frequent complication of vaccine induced microstrokes), and in each case when I asked, they shared they had been vaccinated, and in many cases acknowledged they’d experienced other effects from the vaccine.
However, while it was plainly apparent there was a major issue, due to how much religious euphoria surrounded the “95% effective vaccines which would end the pandemic” it was essentially an exercise in futility to make my colleagues see it (even when they had patients skip visits because, in the relative’s words, they’d died suddenly from a vaccine).
The Absence of Evidence is Not the Evidence of Absence
One of the particularly frustrating things about this situation was that there was a complete lockdown on any information about vaccine injuries, and as such, when people observed them, they normally were dismissed with statements such as: “it’s anecdotal” “if the vaccines were that dangerous it would have shown up in the trials” or “there are no safety signals showing the vaccines are dangerous” and told the observation they made was a complete coincidence that had no bearing on reality.
As such, those who could see the injuries were so frequent it was hard not to miss them were stuck in a cat and mouse game where we had to rely upon finding every possible data set which slipped through the web of censorship that indicated there was an issue (e.g., spikes in disability data, explosions on VAERS etc.) while in tandem, the medical system did all they could to hide those datasets and downplay the ones which emerged (e.g., V-Safe, the system which was supposed to accurately monitor COVID vaccine safety via a set sample size was altered so significant adverse reports would not be reported in it, the CDC blocked public access to incriminating V-Safe data until courts forced them to disclose it and Senator Ron Johnson has obtained records that proved the FDA deliberately suppressed safety signals showing many of the severe injuries from the COVID vaccines were indeed happening).
Note: recognizing this dynamic early on was essentially why I put so much effort over 2021 into creating that log of individuals injured by the COVID vaccines as I felt things were so censored it was unlikely something like that would ever be published otherwise.
Given the censorship from every angle we faced, a novel solution was eventually arrived at—use polling firms to determine the scale of injury. For example, in any sane society, this survey Charlie Kirk took in December 2021 should have permanently ended the vaccine campaign (which three months prior had become mandatory because so many people were not willing to take it).
Likewise, numerous polls (which I summarized in detail here) showed 9%–34% of COVID vaccine recipients developed side effects from the vaccine, 7-13% developed serious side effects, 7.5-22% know someone with a severe vaccine injury, 24-28% know someone who they believe died from the vaccine and 46-55% believe the COVID vaccines have killed a significant number of people.
Ultimately, the thing we really needed was to have a set sample of people who were comprehensively assessed for symptoms before and after vaccination so that an actual injury rate could be calculated, but since the medical system’s game plan was to argue the absence of COVID vaccine injury evidence was proof the vaccine was safe, that data set was never created. Nonetheless, because of how frequent the injuries were, they kept appearing.
High-Profile Injuries
Given the high rate of significant COVID-19 vaccine injuries, two possibilities seem quite plausible.
The first is that the COVID-19 vaccines have also injured numerous public officials.
The second is that if those officials pushed for mandating the COVID-19 vaccines on the population, they would likely try to cover up their injury rather than speak out on the issue.
For example, Illinois Democrat and US Representative Sean Casten’s 17-year-old vaccinated daughter Gwen died suddenly and unexpectedly in her sleep Sunday night, June 12, 2022. For context, prior to the vaccines, a sudden death in an adolescent was extraordinarily rare (one reader calculated a US Representative would be expected to lose a child under 18 once every 200 years).
When independent journalists investigated the events, they found both that Casten’s family aggressively promoted the vaccine and that there was a high likelihood it killed his daughter. However, rather than supply any information to dispel these rumors, Casten in a statement, simply said:
“The only thing we know about her death is that it was peaceful. And the only lesson we can take from that is to savor the moments you have with your loved ones.”
Note: quite a few parents took strong exception to how Casten handled this, and sadly there are other similar examples I can also cite of the “Casten Response.”
In addition to Casten, there have been other suspicious incidents strongly suggestive of COVID-19 vaccine injury existing throughout the Democratic leadership (that included prolonged and conspicuous absences) and of those injuries being covered up.
Democrat Senators
The best dataset I have come across can be found in the U.S. Senate. Briefly, since the vaccines entered the market:
Ben Ray Luján is a freshman New Mexico Democratic Senator who repeatedly promoted the COVID-19 vaccines:
On January 27, 2022, Luján (then 49) was hospitalized in Santa Fe after feeling fatigued and dizzy. He was found to have had a stroke affecting his cerebellum and was transferred to the University of New Mexico Hospital for treatment, which included a decompressive craniectomy. A statement from his office said that “he is expected to make a full recovery”. Luján returned to work at the Senate on March 3 and stated by April 21 that he was 90% recovered.
John Fetterman, a freshman Pennsylvania Democratic Senator (then aged 52) on May 17, 2022, less than a month after strongly endorsing the vaccine, suffered a stroke two days before the state primary for his senate seat. Despite significant signs of cognitive impairment since his stroke, Fetterman somehow won the primary and then the general election. Since becoming elected, Fetterman has had prolonged periods of absence from the U.S. Senate due to needing specialized medical care:
Fetterman was hospitalized for syncope (lightheadedness) for two days beginning on February 10, 2023. Two days after his release he was hospitalized again, for a severe case of major depression. For about two months, Fetterman lived and worked at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. As part of his daily schedule at the hospital, his chief of staff arrived at 10 a.m. on weekdays with newspaper clips, statements for Fetterman to approve, and legislation to review. During his hospitalization, Fetterman co-sponsored a bipartisan rail safety bill, introduced after the derailment of a chemical-carrying train in East Palestine, Ohio, close to the border with Pennsylvania; the regulation aimed to strengthen freight-rail safety regulations to prevent future derailments.
On April 17, 2023, Fetterman returned to the Senate to chair the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry subcommittee on food and nutrition, specialty crops, organics and research. The Washington Post said that Fetterman’s “voice stumbled at times while reading from prepared notes” during the subcommittee hearing, but “he appeared in good spirits” and communicated a message about the importance of fighting hunger.
Senator Chris Van Hollen, on May 15, 2022, had an unusual hemorrhagic stroke (in a vein rather than an artery) while giving a speech.
It is also important to consider that in addition to strokes being one of the most common complications of the COVID-19 vaccines, both Luján and Fetterman were at an age where unexpected strokes are fairly rare (while due to the type Van Hollen’s was also quite rare).
I would argue that both of these events occurring not long after the vaccines entered the market (to a 49-year-old and a 52-year-old within a group of 48 people) was so unlikely that it cannot be attributed to chance.
However, while those two senators’ stories are compelling, Dianne Feinstein’s is the most important one in my opinion.
In late February, Dianne Feinstein was hospitalized for shingles. To quote Steve Kirsch’s investigation of his California senator:
The article in the San Jose Mercury News said her office wouldn’t comment on her medical history regarding shingles due to privacy concerns.
But I’d like to know how keeping her history secret benefits the public.
She pushed the vaccines. Over and over. And over.
She even wanted to require vaccination or COVID tests for air travel.
We all know now how ludicrous such a suggestion was.
Given that shingles typically does not require hospitalization, many assumed Feinstein had suffered a rare but severe complication of shingles like Ramsay Hunt Syndrome due to vaccine immune suppression. Her staff, of course, insisted nothing of concern had happened, and she would be able to return to work soon.
Unfortunately, like Fetterman, a significant neurological injury occurred that became impossible to coverup once she returned, forcing Feinstein and her staff to come clean about what happened:
Adam Russell, a spokesman for Feinstein, said that the encephalitis, or inflammation of the brain, “resolved itself shortly after she was released from the hospital in March.” Feinstein continues to have complications from the Ramsay Hunt syndrome, Russell said.
Russell confirmed the two complications after the New York Times first reported them, raising questions about whether she had been hiding the extent of her illnesses. Upon her return last week, Feinstein was using a wheelchair and noticeably thinner, and has appeared confused at times when speaking to reporters or being wheeled through the halls.
“The senator previously disclosed that she had several complications related to her shingles diagnosis,” Russell said in the statement. “As discussed in the New York Times article, those complications included Ramsay Hunt syndrome and encephalitis.”
Feinstein’s face has appeared partially paralyzed since she returned to the Senate, stirring some speculation about whether she had had a stroke….Encephalitis can also be caused by shingles. The swelling of the brain can have a number of different symptoms, including personality changes, seizures, stiffness, confusion and problems with sight or hearing, according to the Mayo Clinic.
Aides to Feinstein said last week that she is still recovering from her illness and would operate on a reduced schedule. Since she has returned, she has missed some votes where she was not needed. On Wednesday, for example, she missed the first three Senate votes of the day but appeared for the last two, in which the margin was much closer.
While this speaks for itself, the one additional detail I wish to highlight is that, as the above compilation of vaccine injuries shows, encephalitis is a much rarer complication of shingles than the already rare Ramsay Hunt syndrome.
One of the potential complications of this infection is involvement of the central nervous system causing encephalitis. An increased risk of this complication is associated with the immunocompromised patient….According to the World Health Organization, encephalitis occurs in one out of every 33,000–50,000 cases of VZV [shingles].
Note: despite complete physical and cognitive disability (which was an open secret throughout Congress), Feinstein refused to resign and only was replaced after she passed in September 2023.
For context, amongst the 48 Democrat Senators, this constituted an 8.3% rate of severe adverse reactions, which is inline with rates of injuries found throughout polling on this subject.
The post What The US Senate Showed America About COVID-19 Vaccine Toxicity appeared first on LewRockwell.
0 comments on “What The US Senate Showed America About COVID-19 Vaccine Toxicity” Add yours →