I have always been drawn to puzzles that contain large amounts of “unknown information” as this forces you to consider a wide range of possibilities, but simultaneously have the discernment to recognize which of those potential answers is the most probable and hence is less likely to backfire on you if you commit to it.
On one hand, many people have a total intolerance for anything uncertain or unsanctioned (which is why many medical professionals are unwilling to do anything slightly “unorthodox”—even if it is essentially a given that the existing conventional options will lead to a bad outcome for their patient (e.g., death from an “incurable” illness). On the other end of the spectrum, many people will be too eager to commit to unsubstantiated answers, and in many cases (due to confirmation bias), collect a body of highly questionable evidence that supports their chosen possibility (which in the case of the COVID vaccines, has resulted in numerous theories briefly going viral which are completely at odds with reality—and often basic science).
This, in turn, has been the lens I’ve observed the COVID vaccines through, as beyond the mRNA gene therapies still being in the experimental stage when they were given to the entire population, we saw a lot of very strange things occur which hence invited equally strange explanations for what was going on.
For example, since the vaccines came out, embalmers have been observing science fiction-like massive rubbery clots coming out of the bodies of deceased individuals who had been vaccinated. A few citizen researchers, in turn, have been trying to draw attention to this issue and have conducted numerous surveys of embalmers (which many professional organizations resisted) that were able to show those clots indeed were being found, and recently were able to have the 2022-2025 results be published in a medical journal—where across 808 responses, 66% to 83% of embalmers reported finding these clots in roughly 19% to 27% of embalmed bodies.
These disconcerting findings in turn met a variety of expected responses ranging from refusals to discuss the topic at all, to denials they existed (despite the extensive work the citizen journalists did to reveal that they did) to a variety of shocking explanations being put forward to explain what they were (e.g., alien parasites or nanotechnology).
While I was trying to make sense of this topic, I came across a largely unnoticed paper on COVID-19 that stated the spike protein causes fibrin (which the body uses to create long-lasting blood clots) to misfold. Since the body depends on a precise balance between enzymes creating and breaking down fibrin clots, if misfolded fibrin were to be formed, there was a high likelihood that the body’s clot breaking enzymes would no longer match it, and hence that the body would not be able to break these clots, thereby allowing them to grow unchecked until they eventually became the massive clots embalmers were finding, particularly since the study modeling this was able to show (nowhere near as large) irregular fibrin clots formed by the spike protein that were resistant to the enzymes the body used to break down clots—all of which I detailed in this 2022 article. That model then became the accepted explanation and researchers were subsequently able to develop blood tests that showed the amyloid (misfolded) fibrin clots were present in the bloodstream.
Malice or Malfeasance?
Whenever something bad happens on a large scale, a case can normally be made that it was due to a deliberate desire to harm others, incompetence (and a tendency to double-down on one’s mistakes), or simply a complete lack of concern for the human cost of whatever they want to do. I tend to lean towards the latter explanation, as the strongest case frequently exists for it and it does not require ascribing (often ultimately unknowable) motives to someone else.
As such, from early on with the COVID-19 vaccines, I formed the impression that the vaccine industry (and to some extent the US government) felt they needed to get the vaccines to market as quickly as possible. For instance, leaders wanted a “working” vaccine to get to market as soon as possible (and ideally before the 2020 election) so the economy could be opened up, Operation Warp Speed was effectively a winner-take-all competition so whoever got the first vaccines to market would likely make most of the money in it and there was a real likelihood the population would develop herd immunity to COVID-19 before the vaccines came out (negating the need for them in the first place), which led not only to the vaccine being rushed along, but also federal health leaders trying to stall the virus enough for the vaccines to still have a market (e.g., HHS insiders admitted many of the 2020 “containment” measures were done to isolate the population so herd immunity could be delayed,1 and Scott Gottlieb, a recent FDA commissioner who became a Pfizer board member in 2019—advocated for lockdowns and publicly gave statements we were much further away from herd immunity than what he privately told the CIA1,2). In contrast, African nations which did nothing for COVID-19 rapidly developed herd immunity to COVID and had dramatically lower death rates than the Western Nations.
Note: one of the most appalling aspects of this strategy was not only was herd immunity delayed to protect the vaccines, but the unnatural “immunity” the vaccines gave prevented the population from being able to develop herd immunity to COVID-19, thereby turning a passing pandemic into a permanent seasonal infection. This was because the COVID vaccines created a very narrow immunity that locked the immune system onto the original strain (of a rapidly mutating virus), thereby both provoking the rapid evolution of variants but also making those locked onto the original virus less able to mount an immune response to the newer variants—shown by both Cleveland Clinic Research1 and countless Reddit reports of individuals being more likely to catch COVID the more shots they’d gotten1 (and in many cases catch COVID numerous times). While this was probably not intentional, it is notable that just two months after the COVID vaccines hit the market, vaccine CEOs were already talking about the COVID vaccine becoming an annual vaccination like the flu shot.1,2,3,4,5
To expedite the vaccines, again and again, I identified how they appeared to have made the decision to cut as many corners as possible in each stage of its development, testing, production and distribution. As such, I long believed the fiasco we saw was simply due to a desire to make money and a complete lack of concern over the consequences the actions taken would create. However, while researching the existing vaccine designs for a recent article, I came across a rather surprising piece of information that has changed my perspective on what actually happened with the vaccines.
How Vaccines Work
When the body is exposed to a foreign invader, a series of defensive responses are mounted. Some of these are relatively non-specific and hence can initiate immediately, while others are specific to the microbe and, though often more protective later, initially require time to become effective (as the tiny fraction of your randomly generated immune cells which match the invader must encounter them and then after being activated, have time to reproduce enough that a sufficient amount of those cells are present to control the invader).
Note: life revolves around having DNA (or RNA equivalents in certain viruses) be transformed by cellular enzymes into corresponding mRNA sequences, which is then transformed into corresponding protein sequences. Because of this, most organisms contain unique protein sequences that give them a “molecular fingerprint.”
The theory of immunization, in turn, is that if you introduce the antigen (protein fingerprint) of the invader (without the invader also present), it becomes possible for the body to develop adaptive immunity to the antigen (and hence the pathogen which contains that antigen) without also having to survive a potentially dangerous infection. As such, a variety of different antigens are routinely injected under the belief doing so will create immunity to disease—even though in reality this frequently does not work or creates a host of problems from unintended off-target “immunity.” However, due to the religious fervor around vaccinations, the medical field essentially believes in the infallibility of this approach and continually tries to find every feasible way that can be done.
As such, over the years, a variety of methods have been created to develop these antigens.
Originally, the infectious microbe would either be cultured and then chemically inactivated (e.g., killed), filtered or selectively bred (via repeated passages through cellular mediums) so that the microbe was made less dangerous (e.g., no longer infectious) while still containing sufficient antigens to create an immune response (along with the microbe sometimes reproducing within the host and creating even more antigens to ensure the development of an immune response).
Later, once genetic engineering entered the picture, things would either be modified to produce the antigen so it could then be extracted (e.g., modified yeasts for Merck’s HepB and HPV vaccines or moth cells for Novavax), or a virus would be modified to carry the antigen and then mass produced outside of the body so those antigens could be delivered via the viruses (e.g., J&J or AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccines).
Later still, genetic engineering made it possible to instead have the vaccine recipient’s cells produce the antigen (thereby allowing a much lower initial dose of the vaccine to be used). Many public health officials, in turn, pushed for this approach as it takes much less time to create the synthetic mRNA which did that than producing traditional vaccine antigens, thereby making it possible to bring vaccines to market for a new infection much sooner (whereas with annual flu shots, they have to be produced before the flu season and frequently end up being for different strains than what is circulating).
Note: there are a variety of safety and efficacy issues with each of the vaccine designs (e.g., many of the “essential” ones on the market either provide almost no benefit or make their infections worse) and when I went through all the standard ones, I could only identify one you could make a good case provided a net benefit (along with a few non-standard ones like rabies after a bite). However, as mentioned before, due to the faith surrounding vaccines, every vaccine is assumed to be completely safe, effective and essential regardless of the actual data or logic underlying that assumption.
The post The COVID Shot Was Three Vaccines, Not One & How We Can Heal From Them appeared first on LewRockwell.
0 comments on “The COVID Shot Was Three Vaccines, Not One & How We Can Heal From Them” Add yours →