March 30 2025 By Kelvyn Alp, https://nzloyal.com/
The notion that viruses are the primary cause of many diseases has been a cornerstone of modern medicine for over a century.
However, a growing body of research suggests that this paradigm may be fundamentally flawed.
Dr. Mark Bailey’s seminal paper, “A Farewell to Virology,” (2022) and the work of Dr. Sam Bailey, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Dr. Tom Cowan, have collectively challenged the conventional wisdom on viruses and vaccines.
Their research posits that viruses do not exist as disease-causing entities, but rather as misidentified cellular components and other biological phenomena.
This idea is not new and builds on the pioneering work of former virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka and The Perth Group.
However, it has gained significant traction in recent years, largely because of the COVID-19 scamdemic.
The implications of this theory are profound, and they raise a crucial question: if viruses do not exist as claimed, what are we vaccinating against?
The vaccine schedules that govern our lives are based on the assumption that viruses are real and pose a significant threat to public health.
However, if this assumption is incorrect, then the justification for vaccines crumbles.
Are we simply creating a future dependent clientele for pharmaceutical companies?
READ THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE HERE
The post If Viruses Do Not Exist As Claimed, What Are Vaccines For? appeared first on LewRockwell.
0 comments on “If Viruses Do Not Exist As Claimed, What Are Vaccines For?” Add yours →